Taxis banned during the day on the road in front of the Shijiazhuang Municipal Party Committee cause controversy


The picture shows the "no traffic" sign for taxis located on the busy road section of the city. Photo by our reporter Cao Tianjian


  "I really can’t figure it out. In such a busy road section, which is close to the main road of the city, taxis are not allowed to pass. What is the basis for the relevant departments to make this regulation?"


  On February 25, Mr. Xie, who was out of town in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, told reporters about his "experience": he took a taxi from the train station to a unit on Qingyuan Street in the city. When the car reached an intersection less than one kilometer away from his destination, the taxi driver pulled over. He was told that the street where the unit he was going was closed to taxis, and that to reach his destination by car, he had to bypass multiple traffic lights. Helplessly, he had to carry a large bag and a small bag through the streets of Ma Long, the traffic water.


  Xie later learned that because the city’s municipal party committee was on this street, the relevant departments stipulated that taxis were prohibited from passing in front of the municipal party committee from 7 am to 8 pm.


  To "verify" Mr. Xie’s claim, the reporter immediately took a taxi to the prohibited section of the road – the intersection of Zhongshan Road and Qingyuan Street. Sure enough, on the traffic sign pole on the north side of the intersection, the sign that taxis are prohibited from 7 am to 8 pm was in sight.


  The common people question whether the establishment of "forbidden roads" is justified by law


  According to the reporter, in this section of the north-south length of about seven or eight hundred meters of the taxi prohibited road, in addition to a number of government agencies and units, there are thousands of residents living adjacent to the municipal government office building.


  In fact, local citizens and taxi operators have long expressed dissatisfaction with the establishment of "forbidden roads" for taxis in the prosperous areas of the urban area, and some people have even raised the issue that the establishment of "forbidden roads" on the road sections that citizens must travel through every day is undoubtedly a public matter closely related to people’s lives. Have the relevant government departments listened to the opinions of the citizens and considered the public interest when making this decision? Is it legal to set up "forbidden roads", and what procedures have been passed?


  Mr. Zhou of Shijiazhuang Yintai Taxi Company has his own views on the issue of setting up "forbidden roads". He believes that since the owner or driver has the qualification to operate or drive a taxi and pays the corresponding fees to the relevant management department, he has obtained the right to drive on the road according to law. Unless temporary traffic control is implemented due to special circumstances such as important activities, his "right of way" should not be unreasonably restricted.


  According to the relevant regulations, the administrative authority with the power to set up the "no-go" sign should be the public security traffic management department. An unnamed police officer of the city’s public security traffic management bureau made it clear to reporters that the "no-go" road section had been set up for several years and was set up according to a notice from the municipal public security bureau at that time.


  The police officer was not shy about whether the reporter’s suggestion of a "no-go" on this section of the road was as reflected by the public, which was more concerned with the location of the municipal party committee. He said that "there must be this factor".


  The reporter checked the relevant information and showed that in the "Notice on Strengthening Urban Road Traffic Management" issued by the Municipal Public Security Bureau and implemented on June 10, 2005, there are indeed regulations prohibiting taxis from passing through Qingyuan Street (Zhongshan Road to Tan Nan Road). However, on January 17, 2008, the "Interim Measures for the Administration of Urban Road Traffic Order in Shijiazhuang City" issued by the General Office of the Municipal People’s Government (Shi Zheng Ban Fa [2008] No. 9), there are no relevant regulations on the prohibition of taxis.


  Academic Voice: Not only infringement, but also restriction of public resources


  Regarding the issue of "banning" taxis in front of the municipal party committee, Li Zhenkai, a professor at the Department of Law and Economics of Hebei Youth Management Cadre College, believes that unless in special circumstances, the relevant administrative departments need to take temporary traffic control measures to ensure the smooth flow of roads, there is no legal provision prohibiting vehicles that meet the operating conditions or meet the corresponding specifications from driving on public roads. First, there is no legal basis for restricting taxis from passing on a certain road, which is an infringement of the personal management rights of taxi operators. Second, the taxi industry uses road resources for survival, and the use of administrative power to "prohibit" taxis from passing through obviously restricts the use of public resources. Third, from the perspective of citizens, which road to take in a taxi and when to go are the rights of citizens. Setting a "ban" on taxis, forcing passengers to detour, thereby increasing unnecessary expenses, is a waste for citizens, and the government does not compensate accordingly, which is a violation of citizens’ rights. At the same time, setting a "ban" on taxis is also unfair to citizens who need to go to the municipal party committee and other departments on the "forbidden road" to handle various matters, but they do not have a car and have no access to official vehicles.


  Li Zhenkai said that the main feature of the market economy is to require the rational allocation and fair distribution of resources, and to use administrative power to artificially "cut off a piece" of public resources, which obviously deprives the rights of the counterparts of administrative actions. (Our reporter, Atletico Madrid, Cao Tianjian)

Editor in charge: Zhao Deli

Six departments interviewed eight online car-hailing platforms, and the number of rides per day will be limited

  Beijing Evening News (Reporter Sun Hongyang) Yesterday, the Ministry of Transport, the Central Network Information Office, MIIT, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of Emergency Management, and the General Administration of Market Supervision jointly interviewed eight online ride-hailing platform companies, including Didi Chuxing, Shouqi Car-hailing, Shenzhou Youche, Cao Cao Chuxing, Meituan Chuxing, Autonavi, Didi Chuxing, and Hello Chuxing.

  Since the second half of this year, there have been many new situations and new problems in the development of online car-hailing and ride-hailing markets, involving various aspects such as industry safety and stability, which have attracted widespread attention from all walks of life. Cai Tuanjie, deputy director of the Department of Transportation Services of the Ministry of Transport, said that this is a reminder interview, which aims to listen to the opinions and suggestions of platform companies, and remind and supervise the safety production and maintenance of stability of various enterprises to better meet the needs of the masses for travel.

  The interview pointed out that if Hitch is really a "tailwind", the platform companies engaged in Hitch must strictly abide by the relevant regulations on Hitch management. The relevant platform companies must strictly adhere to the safety bottom line, do a good job in the review and dynamic monitoring of the technical performance of the online vehicle and the driver’s background, protect the user’s personal privacy, and ensure safety from the source; to establish and improve the passenger’s rapid response processing mechanism, timely and effective handling of emergencies, especially involving safety emergencies, the platform company shall bear the responsibility of first compensation for safety accidents; to comply with the nature of the ride, it must be based on the driver’s own travel needs, and the travel information must be released in advance. The ride-sharing vehicle is selected by the same fit passengers with the same travel route. The ride-sharing behavior must not be for profit, but only share part of the travel cost with the passengers or assist each other for free. It is strictly forbidden to engage in illegal operations in the name of ride-sharing, and there must be a certain limit on the number of rides per car per day, which is

  The interview also proposed to further accelerate the pace of online car-hailing compliance. All online car-hailing platform companies should take the initiative to cooperate with local management departments, organize qualified drivers and vehicles to apply for online car-hailing licenses as soon as possible in accordance with relevant regulations, strictly implement the relevant requirements of background verification, remove unqualified personnel and vehicles, and strictly prohibit the distribution of orders to vehicles and drivers without business qualifications. Operate in accordance with laws and regulations to ensure the safety and legitimate rights and interests of passengers.

  In addition, some aggregation platforms have recently encountered new problems such as access to non-compliant online car-hailing platform companies, vehicles and drivers, engaging in illegal online car-hailing operations in the name of "aggregation". Aggregation platforms should strengthen the review and verification of the business qualifications of connected online car-hailing platform companies, and urge online car-hailing platforms to strictly check the qualifications of vehicles and drivers, and jointly assume the responsibility of safety protection and the responsibility of solving passenger complaints.

  All platform companies should immediately investigate their own hidden problems such as "rental purchasing" and infringement of driver rights and interests, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of drivers.

  The interview also put forward relevant requirements for each platform company on cyber security, personal information protection, road traffic safety management, public safety risk prevention, online car-hailing price behavior and market competition behavior.